HomeMy WebLinkAbout10.08.26 Board Correspondence - FW_ Why We Cannot Go Back.ATTENTION: This message originated from outside Butte County. Please exercise judgment before opening attachments, clicking on links, or replying..
From:Clerk of the Board
To:Mutony, Heather
Cc:Lee, Lewis
Subject:Board Correspondence - FW: Why We Cannot Go Back
Date:Friday, October 9, 2026 8:13:53 AM
Attachments:https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideHeart%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideComments%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideShare2%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2Fnotes__NoteRestackIcon%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2%26strokeLinecap%3Dround%26strokeLinejoin%3Dround
https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack.com%2Ficon%2FLucideArrowUpRight%3Fv%3D4%26height%3D36%26fill%3Dnone%26stroke%3D%2523808080%26strokeWidth%3D2
image001.png
Please see Board Correspondence -
Lewis LeeAdministrative Technician - ConfidentialButte County Administration25 County Center Drive, Suite 200 • Oroville, CA 95965T: 530.552.3326www.buttecounty.ca.gov | lelee@buttecounty.ca.gov
From: lance dreiss <lancedreiss@att.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2026 7:20 PM
To: Shared Mailbox Clerk of the Board <pcbs@countyofplumas.com>; Senator.Dahle@senate.ca.gov; Assemblymember.Gallagher@assembly.ca.gov;
sheriff@countyofplumas.com; District Attorney <District_Attorney@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Nicolereinert@countyofplumas.com; danpargee@countyofplumas.com;
davidhollister@countyofplumas.com; Soderstrom, Monica <msoderstrom@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Durfee, Peter <PDurfee@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ronald Owens
<ronald@muzzledtruth.com>; Kimmelshue, Tod <TKimmelshue@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Pickett, Andy <APickett@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Connelly, Bill
<BConnelly@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teeter, Doug <DTeeter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Beaudoin, Jarett <JBeaudoin@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Julie Threet <julie4butte5@gmail.com>;
Waugh, Melanie <mwaugh@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Kitts, Melissa <mkitts@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Ritter, Tami <TRitter@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Teri DuBose
<Teri.DuBose@mail.house.gov>; Clerk of the Board <clerkoftheboard@buttecounty.ca.gov>; Stephens, Brad J. <BStephens@buttecounty.ca.gov>
Subject: Fwd: Why We Cannot Go Back
Public Record
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for moreWhy We Cannot Go Back
The real reason we vote.
TRUTHMONSTER - BY JOHN ANTHONY
OCT 6
READ IN APP
Much of my career has been in research. As a teacher, I researched ways to help children learn, become independent thinkers, and problem solvers.
Later, as a consultant I researched how to help managers excel in their fields, improve productivity, and blend different cultures into unified teams.
After retiring I focused on communities and researched what happens to property rights as governments gain more control over lives and assets.
The Wakeup
When COVID hit, like many I believed we faced a life-threatening plague and looked forward to the promised vaccine.
On December 10, 2020, everything changed.
That was the day Pfizer released the COVID-19 Vaccine study to NEJM and the FDA released their Pfizer briefing document.
I did what I always do, researched them.
Both proved the COVID shots accomplished next to nothing.
The 95% effective only referred to the relative drop in a very small baseline risk.
The data shows you would have to treat 119 people for 1 of them, (less than 1%), to avoid having both the symptoms of COVID and a positive PCR test result. But only
for 2 months after the last shot. (The same trial showed unvaccinated participants also had less than a 1% chance of this.)
That’s it. Nothing about severity, hospitalization, transmission, or susceptibility. Pregnant women and the prior infected were excluded so no one had any idea the effect
on them.
· There were 9 protocol amendments on a trial that was already running.
· The case definition was rewritten in the final weeks before data cutoff.
· The median follow-up was under 2 months at authorization.
· Durability decayed to ~84% by month 4–6.
· FDA wanted 75 years to release all the data…reversed only by court order
The 95% headline that was technically true and 100% misleading. (FDA p60)
Pfizer’s own post-marketing report logged 1,223 deaths and 42,086 case reports in three months but redacted the denominator that would let anyone calculate what that
meant.
Fact checkers defended the vaccine arguing you can’t conclude causation. They’re right. But you also can’t conclude safety. Pfizer’s redaction made sure you
couldn’t calculate either.
The bigger story is not the lies, but the way they’ve been perpetuated. Five years later, we are only beginning to have broad awareness of the deceit and its damage.
Silencing Truth, Spreading Lies
The Virality Project: Coordinated mass censorship between federal agencies and social media platforms.
Housed at the Stanford Internet Observatory
· Partnered with the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, Graphika, and NYU,
· Funded through the Stanford Cyber Policy Center.
· Worked directly with platforms to flag content it categorized as misinformation.
· Internal documents released through litigation and congressional inquiry, showed extensive coordination with federal agencies, including DHS and the
Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on how to handle COVID and vaccine content.
· Speech control circumvented the 1stamendment by routing communications through private entities and to social media platforms.
The protocol amendments and litigation changed the permanent record that shapes future conversations and priorities.
Missouri Versus Biden: A First Amendment lawsuit accusing federal officials of coercing social media companies into suppressing disfavored COVID speech.
Litigation discovery showed:
· Nearly daily communication between federal officials and platform trust-and-safety teams.
· Requests, pressure, and implied consequences around COVID and election content.
· A district court initially enjoined much of this; the Supreme Court later ruled on standing grounds, not on whether the pressure was appropriate.
Manipulated studies:
EX. This CDC study used mismatched groups and covid-like symptoms to falsely claim the vaccines were superior to natural immunity.. and it travelled:
· CDC posted the study in their MMR Weekly
· Medical associations and publications repeat the claim
· MEDPAGE Today circulated the flawed study to, “about 83% of U.S. practicing healthcare professionals, including approximately 890,000 validated
physicians and 359,000 nurse specialists.”
· Analysis reveals the study’s claim “…the Covid-recovered have stronger and longer-lasting immunity against Covid disease than the vaccinated” is false.
With COVID, the information control system became part of the normalized infrastructure.
The Election Integrity Project
· In 2020 the same players and mechanisms that drove the COVID censorships were put in place for the election.
· “The members of the Election Integrity Partnership and Virality Project conspiredwith state, local, and federal government officials to violate the First
Amendment rights of social media users…”
Lies Die Hard
It has taken 5 years of exposing the COVID vaccine truth, yet even today, 46.7% of doctors continue to receive and recommend the COVID-19 vaccines.
There’s more work to
diana dreiss
Begin forwarded message:
From: TruthMonster - by John Anthony from The Truth Monster <johnmanthony@substack.com>
Date: October 6, 2026 at 3:24:25 AM PDT
To: lancedreiss@att.net
Subject: Why We Cannot Go Back
Reply-To: TruthMonster - by John Anthony from The Truth Monster
<reply+3mdwgv&kcryl&&da0deb43f1e3f4744f61b6046b2ad4dc66894ba7afb9ce178581eb1157564d4b@mg1.substack.com>
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for moreWhy We Cannot Go Back
The real reason we vote.
TRUTHMONSTER - BY JOHN ANTHONY
OCT 6
READ IN APP
Much of my career has been in research. As a teacher, I researched ways to help children learn, become independent thinkers, and problem solvers.
Later, as a consultant I researched how to help managers excel in their fields, improve productivity, and blend different cultures into unified teams.
After retiring I focused on communities and researched what happens to property rights as governments gain more control over lives and assets.
The Wakeup
When COVID hit, like many I believed we faced a life-threatening plague and looked forward to the promised vaccine.
On December 10, 2020, everything changed.
That was the day Pfizer released the COVID-19 Vaccine study to NEJM and the FDA released their Pfizer briefing document.
I did what I always do, researched them.
Both proved the COVID shots accomplished next to nothing.
The 95% effective only referred to the relative drop in a very small baseline risk.
The data shows you would have to treat 119 people for 1 of them, (less than 1%), to avoid having both the symptoms of COVID and a positive PCR test
result. But only for 2 months after the last shot. (The same trial showed unvaccinated participants also had less than a 1% chance of this.)
That’s it. Nothing about severity, hospitalization, transmission, or susceptibility. Pregnant women and the prior infected were excluded so no one had any
idea the effect on them.
From day 1, nearly everything coming out of Pfizer was compromised:
There were 9 protocol amendments on a trial that was already running.
The case definition was rewritten in the final weeks before data cutoff.
The median follow-up was under 2 months at authorization.
Durability decayed to ~84% by month 4–6.
FDA wanted 75 years to release all the data…reversed only by court order
The 95% headline that was technically true and 100% misleading. (FDA p60)
Pfizer’s own post-marketing report logged 1,223 deaths and 42,086 case reports in three months but redacted the denominator that would let anyone
calculate what that meant.
Fact checkers defended the vaccine arguing you can’t conclude causation. They’re right. But you also can’t conclude safety. Pfizer’s redaction
made sure you couldn’t calculate either.
The bigger story is not the lies, but the way they’ve been perpetuated. Five years later, we are only beginning to have broad awareness of the deceit and its
damage.
Silencing Truth, Spreading Lies
The Virality Project: Coordinated mass censorship between federal agencies and social media platforms.
Housed at the Stanford Internet Observatory
Partnered with the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, Graphika, and NYU,
Funded through the Stanford Cyber Policy Center.
Worked directly with platforms to flag content it categorized as misinformation.
Internal documents released through litigation and congressional inquiry, showed extensive coordination with federal agencies, including DHS and
the Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on how to handle COVID and vaccine content.
Speech control circumvented the 1st amendment by routing communications through private entities and to social media platforms.
The protocol amendments and litigation changed the permanent record that shapes future conversations and priorities.
Missouri Versus Biden: A First Amendment lawsuit accusing federal officials of coercing social media companies into suppressing disfavored COVID
speech. Litigation discovery showed:
Nearly daily communication between federal officials and platform trust-and-safety teams.
Requests, pressure, and implied consequences around COVID and election content.
A district court initially enjoined much of this; the Supreme Court later ruled on standing grounds, not on whether the pressure was appropriate.
Manipulated studies:
EX. This CDC study used mismatched groups and covid-like symptoms to falsely claim the vaccines were superior to natural immunity.. and it travelled:
CDC posted the study in their MMR Weekly
Medical associations and publications repeat the claim
MEDPAGE Today circulated the flawed study to, “about 83% of U.S. practicing healthcare professionals, including approximately 890,000 validated
physicians and 359,000 nurse specialists.”
Analysis reveals the study’s claim “…the Covid-recovered have stronger and longer-lasting immunity against Covid disease than the vaccinated” is
false.
With COVID, the information control system became part of the normalized infrastructure.
The Election Integrity Project
In 2020 the same players and mechanisms that drove the COVID censorships were put in place for the election.
“The members of the Election Integrity Partnership and Virality Project conspired with state, local, and federal government officials to violate the
First Amendment rights of social media users…”
Lies Die Hard
It has taken 5 years of exposing the COVID vaccine truth, yet even today, 46.7% of doctors continue to receive and recommend the COVID-19 vaccines.
There’s more work to